1/10/2024 0 Comments Cubase pro 10 crack francais![]() But it pays the price in other areas for having these strengths, like an inferior MIDI editor and mixer. Anyone with a passing knowledge of DAWs can pick up and get going quickly, and everything is in one window. If I can compare to something like Ableton Live, the latter is super intuitive. It often will include features long after they are standard in other DAWs, and they aren't always as elegantly implemented. Steinberg development can be notoriously slow tbh. I feel this is in part due to its initial design and its development over the subsequent years. Many of its features are hidden behind menus and such and require delving into the manual at depth. and happy about that :)Ĭubase is a very powerful program, but it's not nearly as intuitive to use as some other more popular DAWs. Used to use Pro Tools regularly but no more. Also been using Ableton for about 10 years. I've been using Cubase for a good 14 years or so. TLDR: Cubase is better at more things overall, Ableton is better/simpler for a few specific things that are very popular in recent years. ![]() If you don’t need/want those things, then you’re not missing anything :) There are third party plugs that kinda do what Racks do, but none are as frictionless.Ĭubase is excellent - the MIDI tools are the best out there IMO, but some things are a more work than in other DAWs. Manipulating/mangling audio clips for sound designĪutomation of everything (some things like grain size and arp rate are not automatable in Cubase) I’d say most of their audience has never touched a traditional mixer, so it makes no sense to stick to that model.įor me, Ableton beats Cubase for a few specific things: This means they don’t need to follow the traditional models, they make great use of a “software first” mentality. Composing & tracking in Live are really lacking in comparison. So they recreated the analog recording models in software ie mixers with inserts and sends etc as well as building flexible MIDI tools, score editor etc.Ībleton has always been focused on electronic music. Part of the reason Cubase doesn’t have something like that is partly history, partly audience IMO.Ĭubase is used by film composers & recording artists (i.e with mics and instruments and all) and excels in those areas. Not that you can’t do most of it in Cubase, but some things are a lot simpler in Ableton.Ĭubase is my main DAW, but I use Ableton too for sound design and live stuff.Ĭubase doesn’t have anything quite like Ableton’s Racks. Ableton is better for the various modern electronic genres.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |